如何厘清职业规避与个人交往的关系/界线？

Zhoudan wrote:

跟规避没有关系

我觉得更多的还是网上往来的性质造成的。几年前有位PM离开公司，写邮件告诉了我，邮件末尾说，不知道双方今后会不会有交集，挺伤感的。

规避主要是防止你越过翻译公司直接跟最终客户联系。在Linked之类的网站上跟PM连接，我觉得不存在规避问题。

In a highly mobile society like the United States, people who relocate for work, school or simply to "wipe the slate clean" tend to jettison replaceable objects when they move.

According to a new study from the University of Kansas appearing in the journal Personal Relationships, the mindset that objects are disposable extends to social ties.

"We found a correlation between the way you look at objects and perceive your relationships," said lead author Omri Gillath, associate professor of psychology. "If you move around a lot, you develop attitudes of disposability toward objects, furniture, books, devices -- basically whatever merchandise you have at home, your car even."

Zhoudan wrote:
规避主要是防止你越过翻译公司直接跟最终客户联系。在Linked之类的网站上跟PM连接，我觉得不存在规避问题。

wherestip wrote:



I agree with Zhoudan. I think it has more to do with the U.S. being a highly mobile society where people constantly move from place to place.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160222144332.htm

Not that it's a good thing, of course.

lbone wrote:

我记得以前我发主贴有人回复我时，都有邮件通知的，现在不知怎么没有了。

wherestip wrote:



lbone,

In order to receive notifications of postings, go to "Forum settings -> Homepage forums", and check the boxes (□) of the forums you'd like to track.

lbone wrote:



我们说的应该不是一回事。如果track某个forum的话，这个论坛里每次有人发主贴或回帖都会有邮件通知。我说的只是自己发的主贴，我印象以前自己发的主贴每次有人回帖时都有邮件通知的，现在不知道是ProZ改革了还是怎么回事，没通知了。

我刚点了下顶上的“track this topic”，结果出来个XML结构，还有一行字：“This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.” 也许是ProZ出bug了，导致thread都不能track。

David Lin wrote:

You could raise a staff support ticket at the bottom of this page and select the link "Submit a support request" so ProZ.com staff could address the issue.

pkchan wrote:

PM 的客套話數則

就算是私下的客套話，都是與公事有關，這應是專業底線。

Preston Decker wrote:

and I wonder whether clauses like these are actually enforceable and/or if courts would construe them as being appropriate only for full-time employees.

Wouldn't want to be the guinea pig for a lawsuit over this, but it would be fascinating to know whether or not these are valid clauses in a client/contractor contract.