Jul 10, 2006 16:46
17 yrs ago
1 viewer *
français term
Hongrie
Is this sentence missing a "que"?
Non-PRO
français vers anglais
Autre
Général / conversation / salutations / correspondance
It seems to me that a "que" is missing to correspond with the "ne":
Perhaps it should read "...qu'uniquement dans le(s) magasins...". Qu'est-ce que vous en pensez?
Perhaps it should read "...qu'uniquement dans le(s) magasins...". Qu'est-ce que vous en pensez?
Proposed translations
(anglais)
| 4 | [No] |
Andreas THEODOROU
|
| 4 +3 | - |
Christine Schmit (X)
|
Change log
Jul 10, 2006 17:21: writeaway changed "Field" from "Droit / Brevets" to "Art / Littérature" , "Field (specific)" from "Droit : contrat(s)" to "Général / conversation / salutations / correspondance"
Jul 10, 2006 20:52: JCEC changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Jul 10, 2006 21:10: Tony M changed "Field" from "Art / Littérature" to "Autre"
Proposed translations
7 minutes
Andreas THEODOROU
Espagne
Espagne
Native in anglais
Specializes in field
Espagne
Translator/writer (medical/pharma specn)
Native in: anglais
Works in: grec vers anglais, français vers anglais, espagnol vers anglais, and 2 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
4
français term (edited):
Is this sentence missing a
Selected
[No]
It is wrong IMNSHO
To correct it
take out 'ne'
or
change 'uniquement' to 'que'
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2006-07-10 16:57:43 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I'd take out 'ne' actually because otherwise the distance between ne and que is too high - presumably this was the author's thinking too
To correct it
take out 'ne'
or
change 'uniquement' to 'que'
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2006-07-10 16:57:43 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I'd take out 'ne' actually because otherwise the distance between ne and que is too high - presumably this was the author's thinking too
Note from asker:
| Thank you kindly, Andy. Succinctly helpful. :) |
2 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Both suggestions were helpful and consistent - I wish I could divide the points. But since Andy answered first, and he proposed a nuance of criteria for how to decide, I must select his answer for Kudoz points. I know it's SUGGESTED that we wait 24 hours, but I'm happy with these answers, and don't want to keep receiving new answer notifications while working on this (deadline, concentration, etc.). I awarded 2 points because it's native language grammar, not coming up with a translation. I think that's the convention here on ProZ. Thanks to both of you!!!!!!"
+3
12 minutes
français term (edited):
Is this sentence missing a
-
apparemment l'auteur a mélangé deux structures différentes :
1) Il s'engage à n'utiliser ... que dans le magasin
2) Il s'engage à utiliser ... uniquement dans le magasin
1) Il s'engage à n'utiliser ... que dans le magasin
2) Il s'engage à utiliser ... uniquement dans le magasin
Note from asker:
| Merci, Christine! |
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
writeaway
: yes-I think it may be a case of bad editing-they decided to change to uniquement and forgot to remove the ne ... As you say, they ended up with a mixture instead.
6 minutes
|
|
merci
|
|
| agree |
Tony M
: The most logical explanation, IMHO!
4 heures
|
|
thanks Tony!
|
|
| agree |
df49f (X)
: oui, bonne explication - should have been asked in FR monolingual pair
5 heures
|
Something went wrong...