There's no hard and fast answer here. Peer review, peer evaluation, group peer evaluation, peer group work evaluation, peer group critique - are all used. In the art world, they call it a "crit" (short for criticism or critique) but this is rather informal.

"rondes" like these where students pass their work on to other groups for peer review for whatever the lesson type are considered "round-robin" exercises (or so we called them when I taugh Summerbridge; but I'm not an authority on whether this is used in the UK).

These can be writing excercises where students explore collaborative creative writing, they can be critiquing exercises as described in the "schrijfronde" , they can be discussion exercises, brainstorming exercises... anything. But the concept, at least as I am familiar with it in its most general sense in the Educational field is some type of a "round-robin exercise", where the primary emphasis is on each individual group taking turns at performing some task.

From reference 2 for example:
<blockquote>
The round-robin review technique is a process of desk-checking by multiple peers in a sequential manner. The initial checker makes his/her review, identifies and logs defects, then passes the folder to the next reviewer who performs the review adding and logging any additional defects. This continues until all the reviewers have participated and the folder is returned to the author. Round-robin review advantages and disadvantages are: it is more efficient than simple desk-checking, multiple reviewers are involved, roles can be assigned, typically a lower cost than other review techniques; however it is not as efficient as inspections.
</blockquote>