| Pages sur ce sujet: [1 2] > |
| Utilisateur | Auteur du fil: ProZ.com Staff Poll: Is the WWA feedback you have received visible in your profile? |
ProZ.com Staff États-Unis COLLABORATEUR DU SITE |
This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "Is the WWA feedback you have received visible in your profile?".
View the poll here
A forum topic will appear each time a new poll is run. For more information, see: http://proz.com/topic/33629
| | | |
Enrique Argentine
Membre (2006) COLLABORATEUR DU SITE | |
Nesrin Royaume-Uni
Membre (2005) anglais vers arabe + ... MODÉRATEUR | | "No Feedback collected" | Jul 1 |
That's what it says on my page - an option that the poll should have included, in my opinion.
It's not that I haven't received feedback yet. I've just never asked for any and don't plan to do so. So I chose Other-N/A.
| | | |
Özden Arıkan Allemagne
Membre anglais vers turc MODÉRATEUR |
I didn't collect any feedback, but some agencies I worked with entered WWA comments. I keep them invisible and have no intention to change this in the future. Had there been an option to make only the client names invisible, then I might have considered using it - but not necessarily.
My reasons:
1) I don't want to announce my clients' names.
2) I don't consider WWA a meaningful marketing tool, because it doesn't give me the opportunity to provide any substantial information on what I have done. Therefore, I prefer using the Project History tool and list my important projects together with valuable and relevant information like the subject field, volume, dates, styles, specialized knowledge, maybe formatting and CAT skills, etc., and yes, together with comments from clients whose names I can still keep confidential.
| | | |
gianfranco Brésil
Membre (2003) anglais vers italien + ... MODÉRATEUR |
Özden Arıkan wrote:
2) I don't consider WWA a meaningful marketing tool, because it doesn't give me the opportunity to provide any substantial information on what I have done. Therefore, I prefer using the Project History tool and list my important projects together with valuable and relevant information like the subject field, volume, dates, styles, specialized knowledge, maybe formatting and CAT skills, etc., and yes, together with comments from clients whose names I can still keep confidential. |
|
Gianfranco
| | | |
ariffo Chili
Membre anglais vers espagnol |
Same as Nesrin anz Özden, especially Özden's "I don't want to announce my clients' names". Make that "I can't and I won't announce my clients' names".
I still find it funny that I can be filtered out in searches by potential outsourcers due to my refusal to breach the confidentiality agreements I have signed, but that has already been discussed to no end.
Greetings.
[Edited at 2008-07-01 17:13]
| | | |
|
|
Claudia Alvis États-Unis
Membre anglais vers espagnol + ... |
Andrea Riffo wrote:
Same as Nesrin anz Özden, especially Özden's "I don't want to announce my clients' names". Make that "I can't and I won't announce my clients' names".
Greetings.
[Edited at 2008-07-01 17:07] |
|
Same here.
Furthermore, I've been wondering for a while what do outsourcers think of WWA's. I think I requested WWA entries to a few clients, only got two. But after careful consideration, I realized what Özden said, I don't feel comfortable about publishing my clients' information (for several reasons), so I stopped. Now I wonder how agencies and outsourcers really feel about these type of requests and if they find them annoying. Although I been tempted to contact other ProZ.com clients about this.
| | | |
Margreet Logmans Pays-Bas
Membre (2006) anglais vers néerlandais + ... | | Instead of references | Jul 1 |
I do have WWA's, and I use them instead of references.
Whenever someone asks me for references, I tell them to check my WWA's.
I only ask agencies for WWA's, never direct clients. So far, they are happy to provide them. I don't ask unless I've worked with them for quite a while, though. I usually provide a BB entry for them at the same time.
If there is any kind of trouble in the working relationship, I don't post a positive BB and I don't ask for WWA's.
I get the impression that agencies prefer to enter a WWA rather than give a reference. I would, anyway.
| | | |
mariana24 Uruguay
Membre (2007) anglais vers espagnol + ... |
Margreet Logmans wrote:
I do have WWA's, and I use them instead of references.
Whenever someone asks me for references, I tell them to check my WWA's.
I only ask agencies for WWA's, never direct clients. So far, they are happy to provide them. I don't ask unless I've worked with them for quite a while, though. I usually provide a BB entry for them at the same time.
If there is any kind of trouble in the working relationship, I don't post a positive BB and I don't ask for WWA's.
I get the impression that agencies prefer to enter a WWA rather than give a reference. I would, anyway. |
|
Mariana
| | | |
ariffo Chili
Membre anglais vers espagnol |
Margreet Logmans wrote:
I only ask agencies for WWA's, never direct clients. So far, they are happy to provide them. I don't ask unless I've worked with them for quite a while, though. I usually provide a BB entry for them at the same time.
|
|
What if you work for direct clients only?
| | | |
Elvia Rodriguez Mexique
Membre (2007) anglais vers espagnol + ... |
Margreet Logmans wrote:
I do have WWA's, and I use them instead of references.
Whenever someone asks me for references, I tell them to check my WWA's.
I only ask agencies for WWA's, never direct clients. So far, they are happy to provide them. I don't ask unless I've worked with them for quite a while, though. I usually provide a BB entry for them at the same time.
If there is any kind of trouble in the working relationship, I don't post a positive BB and I don't ask for WWA's.
I get the impression that agencies prefer to enter a WWA rather than give a reference. I would, anyway. |
|
... and WWA has worked wonderful for me.
| | | |
|
|
Giuseppina Gatta États-Unis
Membre (2005) anglais vers italien + ... |
Özden Arıkan wrote:
I didn't collect any feedback, but some agencies I worked with entered WWA comments. I keep them invisible and have no intention to change this in the future. Had there been an option to make only the client names invisible, then I might have considered using it - but not necessarily.
My reasons:
1) I don't want to announce my clients' names.
2) I don't consider WWA a meaningful marketing tool, because it doesn't give me the opportunity to provide any substantial information on what I have done. Therefore, I prefer using the Project History tool and list my important projects together with valuable and relevant information like the subject field, volume, dates, styles, specialized knowledge, maybe formatting and CAT skills, etc., and yes, together with comments from clients whose names I can still keep confidential. |
|
Exactly, plus I don't want to bother my clients asking for something that I obviously already know, i.e. that they are willing to work again with me and I don't see how this could be otherwise beneficial to others.
Giusi
[Edited at 2008-07-01 20:49]
| | | |
Muriel Vasconcellos États-Unis
Membre (2003) espagnol vers anglais + ... | | Visible to me, or to visiters? | Jul 1 |
I don't think the question is clear. I answered "yes," but I would have to check to see if it's visible to visitors.
| | | |
Asimenia Argentine
Membre anglais vers espagnol + ... |
mariana24 wrote:
Margreet Logmans wrote:
I do have WWA's, and I use them instead of references.
Whenever someone asks me for references, I tell them to check my WWA's.
I only ask agencies for WWA's, never direct clients. So far, they are happy to provide them. I don't ask unless I've worked with them for quite a while, though. I usually provide a BB entry for them at the same time.
If there is any kind of trouble in the working relationship, I don't post a positive BB and I don't ask for WWA's.
I get the impression that agencies prefer to enter a WWA rather than give a reference. I would, anyway. |
|
Mariana |
|
Now, why would this breach a NDA? When I enter a confidentiality agreement, I agree not to disclose the translations, subject or text I deal with, but there is no trouble at all to state the name of my clients. Also, I can ask for feedback and the clients are always free to say "no" if they want to be kept confidential.
I consider the WWA a useful tool in order to provide references instead of having to ask my clients for a reference every time I need one. Plus, I can always choose which of my clients I want to show.
Asimenia
| | | |
Steven Capsuto États-Unis
Membre (2004) français vers anglais + ... |
My client list is one of my most valuable business assets, along with my TMs and termbases. Why in the world would I publish it?
I'm always happy to help people with terms in KudoZ or give helpful advice to colleagues, but it's quite another thing to shoot myself in the foot by giving away a client list it has taken me years to build up. Several clients have posted WWAs to my profile (all positive) but I don't display them.
[Edited at 2008-07-02 13:24]
| | | |
| Pages sur ce sujet: [1 2] > |